Papatoetoe Contract Bridge Club : Detailed data for Monday: March Open Pairs (2014)

View by:

EW pairs

Hand records

Datum value is the average score. Where a bracketed value is included this is calculated without the outliers.

Detailed data for

Monday: March Open Pairs (2014) 31 March

EW pair 1

Section b

Margaret Harris
Sonja Mc Guff

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	1	4	E	K	-1	1	050	10 - 02
2	1	4	N	T	-1	1	-100	00 - 12
3	1	4	S	2	+1	1	450	09 - 03
4	5	4	W	A	=	5	-620	07 - 05
5	5	4	N	T	-1	5	-100	06 - 06
6	5	1 NT	S	6	-1	5	-50	10 - 02
7	2	2 NT	E	J	+2	2	-180	08 - 04
8	2	4	W	A	-1	2	050	09 - 03
9	2	2	E	A	-1	2	100	08 - 04
10	6	3 NT	E	6	-1	6	100	08 - 04
11	6	2	E	K	+1	6	-140	08 - 04
12	6	2	N	T	+2	6	170	04 - 08
13	3	2	E	8	=	3	-90	06 - 06
14	3	3	N	A	-1	3	-50	02 - 10
15	3	4	N	K	=	3	620	09 - 03
16	7	3	W	A	-1	7	100	12 - 00
17	7	1	W	A	+1	7	-110	02 - 10
18	7	3	E	3	-2	7	100	01 - 11
19	4	5	W	A	-1	4	100	12 - 00
20	4	5	S	5	+2	4	710	08 - 04
21	4	3	N	J	-2	4	-200	06 - 06

EW pair 2

Section b

John Waters
Mei Tsai

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	4	4	E	K	-1	5	050	10 - 02
2	4	3	S	A	+2	5	200	07 - 05
3	4	6	S	A	-1	5	-50	00 - 12
4	1	4	W	A	+1	2	-650	02 - 10
5	1	4	N	3	-1	2	-100	06 - 06
6	1	2	E	A	=	2	-110	02 - 10
7	5	3 NT	E	J	-1	6	100	11 - 01
8	5	5	W	A	-1	6	050	09 - 03
9	5	3 NT	W	4	-4	6	400	12 - 00
10	2	3 NT	E	5	-1	3	100	08 - 04
11	2	2	W	A	+2	3	-170	04 - 08
12	2	3 NT	S	K	=	3	600	06 - 06
13	6					7		0-999.9 - 0-999.9
14	6	2 x	N	A	+1	7	570	12 - 00
15	6	2 NT	S	4	-1	7	-100	01 - 11
16	3	3	W	A	=	4	-140	05 - 07
17	3	5 x	W	A	-2	4	300	12 - 00
18	3	3	N	5	+1	4	170	12 - 00
22	8	3	N	A	+1	1	130	04.8 - 07.1
23	8	1 NT	W	T	=	1	-90	04 - 08
24	8					1		0-999.9 - 0-999.9

EW pair 3

Section b

Amit Sengupta
Paul Banerjee

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	8	4	E	K	=	2	-420	03 - 09
2	8	3	N	2	+1	2	170	04 - 08
3	8	4	S	5	=	2	420	03 - 09
4	4	4	W	A	+1	6	-650	02 - 10
5	4	5	W	A	-1	6	050	10 - 02
6	4	2	N	J	-2	6	-100	05 - 07
7	1	4	W	A	+1	3	-650	02 - 10
8	1	4	N	T	-1	3	-50	05 - 07
9	1	4	E	A	-1	3	100	08 - 04
10	5	1 NT	W	3	+1	7	-120	02 - 10
11	5	4	W	Q	-1	7	050	10 - 02
12	5	4	S	K	-1	7	-100	01 - 11
13	2	2	S	J	-1	4	-100	01.3 - 10.6
14	2	3	N	3	=	4	140	08 - 04
15	2	3 NT	S	4	=	4	600	05 - 07
19	7	3 NT	W	3	+4	1	-720	02 - 10
20	7	4	S	K	+3	1	710	08 - 04
21	7	3 NT x	W	2	-3	1	500	12 - 00
22	3	2	S	J	=	5	110	02.5 - 09.5
23	3	2	S	Q	=	5	090	07 - 05
24	3	2	W	K	=	5	-110	00.4 - 11.6

EW pair 4

Section b

Kerry King
Graeme Bell

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	3	2	S	2	-2	6	-100	06 - 06
2	3	4	N	6	=	6	620	10 - 02
3	3	4	S	3	+1	6	450	09 - 03
4	8	2	W	A	+2	3	-170	10 - 02
5	8	5	N	2	-2	3	-200	01 - 11
6	8	1 NT	S	8	-1	3	-50	10 - 02
7	4	4	W	A	=	7	-620	05 - 07
8	4	3	W	A	=	7	-140	00 - 12
9	4	2	N	A	-1	7	-50	03 - 09
10	1	2 NT	E	T	-1	4	100	08 - 04
11	1	1	N	A	+1	4	090	12 - 00
12	1	4	N	T	=	4	620	09 - 03
16	6	1	N	A	-1	1	-50	10 - 02
17	6	2	N	2	+1	1	140	10 - 02
18	6	2	N	8	+1	1	140	06 - 06
19	2	4	E	K	+3	5	-710	05 - 07
20	2	5 NT	N	3	+2	5	720	12 - 00
21	2	4	N	K	-2	5	-200	06 - 06
22	7					2		0-999.9 - 0-999.9
23	7	2	S	5	-1	2	-100	01 - 11
24	7	PASS				2	0	07.4 - 04.6

EW pair 5

Section b

Suzie Ingram
Patricia Treherne

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	7	4	E	8	-1	3	050	10 - 02
2	7	2	N	4	+3	3	200	07 - 05
3	7	4	S	3	+1	3	450	09 - 03
4	3	4	W	A	-1	7	100	12 - 00
5	3	3	N	T	-1	7	-100	06 - 06
6	3	2 NT	S	6	-3	7	-150	00 - 12
7	8	4	W	K	=	4	-620	05 - 07
8	8	4	N	2	-2	4	-100	02 - 10
9	8	4	S	Q	-1	4	-50	03 - 09
13	5	2	W	6	=	1	-90	06 - 06
14	5	2	N	A	=	1	110	06 - 06
15	5	4	N	J	-1	1	-100	01 - 11
16	1	2	W	A	+1	5	-140	05 - 07
17	1	4	S	A	-1	5	-50	05 - 07
18	1	2	E	6	-3	5	150	09 - 03
19	6	5	W	A	=	2	-600	10 - 02
20	6	4	S	J	+3	2	710	08 - 04
21	6	4	N	K	-2	2	-200	06 - 06
22	2	2	S	4	+1	6	140	07.1 - 04.8
23	2	3	S	2	-1	6	-100	01 - 11
24	2	PASS				6	0	07.4 - 04.6

EW pair 6

Section b

Susan Thorne
Phil Lynch

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	2	4	E	K	=	7	-420	03 - 09
2	2	1 NT	W	2	-1	7	050	02 - 10
3	2	4	S	A	=	7	420	03 - 09
4	7	4	W	K	+1	4	-650	02 - 10
5	7	5 x	W	K	-1	4	100	12 - 00
6	7	1 NT	S	8	-2	4	-100	05 - 07
10	4	1 NT	W	7	+2	1	-150	00 - 12
11	4	2	W	5	+3	1	-200	00 - 12
12	4	3 NT	N	2	+1	1	630	12 - 00
13	8	2	S	8	-1	5	-100	01.3 - 10.6
14	8	3	N	K	+2	5	200	10 - 02
15	8	3 NT	S	A	+3	5	690	12 - 00
16	5	1 NT x	N	5	-3	2	-500	00 - 12
17	5	4	W	A	=	2	-420	00 - 12
18	5	4	E	6	-3	2	150	09 - 03
19	1	6	E	5	+1	6	-1460	00 - 12
20	1	5	N	Q	+2	6	640	04 - 08
21	1	2	E	9	+2	6	-170	10 - 02
22	6	1	S	8	=	3	080	00.1 - 11.8
23	6	1 NT	E	4	-1	3	100	10 - 02
24	6					3		0-999.9 - 0-999.9

EW pair 7

Section b

Peggy McGuff
Lois Reid

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
1	6	4	E	T	+1	4	-450	00 - 12
2	6	4	N	4	+1	4	650	12 - 00
3	6	5	S	A	=	4	450	09 - 03
7	3	3 NT	E	J	-1	1	100	11 - 01
8	3	5	S	A	=	1	400	12 - 00
9	3	3	E	2	-1	1	100	08 - 04
10	7	3	W	7	-2	5	200	12 - 00
11	7	3	W	K	+1	5	-170	04 - 08
12	7	4	S	A	-1	5	-100	01 - 11
13	4	1	E	7	=	2	-70	09.5 - 02.5
14	4	2	E	A	-1	2	050	04 - 08
15	4	3 NT	S	3	=	2	600	05 - 07
16	8	2	N	A	-2	6	-100	08 - 04
17	8	4	W	A	-1	6	050	08 - 04
18	8	3	E	A	-2	6	100	01 - 11
19	5	3 NT	E	2	+3	3	-690	08 - 04
20	5	5	N	4	+1	3	620	02 - 10
21	5	4	E	K	=	3	-420	01 - 11
22	1	2	W	T	-2	7	200	09.5 - 02.5
23	1	1	S	K	+1	7	090	07 - 05
24	1	1 NT	N	Q	-1	7	-50	03.2 - 08.8

EW pair 8

Section b

Pam Watson
Anita Arbery

Bd	Rd	Con	Dc	Ld	Res	NS	Score	MP
4	2	4	W	A	=	1	-620	07 - 05
5	2	4	N	3	-2	1	-200	01 - 11
6	2	1 NT	S	6	-1	1	-50	10 - 02
7	6	5 NT	E	2	+1	5	-690	00 - 12
8	6	5	S	A	-1	5	-50	05 - 07
9	6	4	N	A	-4	5	-200	00 - 12
10	3	1 NT	E	8	=	2	-90	04 - 08
11	3	2	E	8	+2	2	-170	04 - 08
12	3	4	S	A	=	2	620	09 - 03
13	7	1	S	J	=	6	080	11.8 - 00.1
14	7	2	W	3	+2	6	-130	00 - 12
15	7	4	N	6	=	6	620	09 - 03
16	4	2	W	A	+2	3	-170	02 - 10
17	4	3	S	A	-1	3	-50	05 - 07
18	4	3	N	8	=	3	110	04 - 08
19	8	4	E	3	+3	7	-710	05 - 07
20	8	4	N	J	+3	7	190	00 - 12
21	8	4	E	K	=	7	-420	01 - 11
22	5	3 NT	N	5	=	4	400	11.8 - 00.1
23	5	2	W	T	-2	4	200	12 - 00
24	5	1 NT	S	4	=	4	090	11.6 - 00.4